Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:14:33 +0200
- In-reply-to: <87pq6iskbe.wl%MarkoSchuetz@web.de>
- References: <87pq6iskbe.wl%MarkoSchuetz@web.de>
Le 22/08/2012 23:12, Marko Sch?tz Schmuck a ?crit : > (exists i_1:int32, > 0<= integer_of_int32(i_1) and > integer_of_int32(i_1)<= integer_of_int32(endi) -> I suspect that you made a stupid mistake here, you probably meant exists ..., ... and with an "and" instead instead of "->" Usually you want \forall int i; H ==> .. or \exists int i; H && ... rarely the converse - Claude -- Claude March? | tel: +33 1 72 92 59 69 INRIA Saclay - ?le-de-France | Universit? Paris-sud, Bat. 650 | http://www.lri.fr/~marche/ F-91405 ORSAY Cedex |
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- From: MarkoSchuetz at web.de (Marko Schütz Schmuck)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- From: MarkoSchuetz at web.de (Marko Schütz Schmuck)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Index(es):