Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:17:19 +0200
- In-reply-to: <87pq6iskbe.wl%MarkoSchuetz@web.de>
- References: <87pq6iskbe.wl%MarkoSchuetz@web.de>
Generally speaking, to "debug" such a proof, I launch an interactive prover like Coq. By trying to do that proof by hand you wuold have seen the mistake. And launching on a PO is greatly greatly easier with Why3 instead of Why2 : so I'd like to suggest to try using Why3 back-end of jessie ! (which is indeed the only one which is maintained and evolves) - Claude -- Claude March? | tel: +33 1 72 92 59 69 INRIA Saclay - ?le-de-France | Universit? Paris-sud, Bat. 650 | http://www.lri.fr/~marche/ F-91405 ORSAY Cedex |
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- From: MarkoSchuetz at web.de (Marko Schütz Schmuck)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- From: MarkoSchuetz at web.de (Marko Schütz Schmuck)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie plug-in
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie proof obligation not discharged?
- Index(es):