Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- From: guillaume.melquiond at inria.fr (Guillaume Melquiond)
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:52:55 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20121218090913.GB2097@damazan>
- References: <20121218090913.GB2097@damazan>
Le mardi 18 d?cembre 2012 ? 10:09 +0100, Pierre-Lo?c Garoche a ?crit : > Hi all, > > Could anybody clarify the current state of the various tools: Frama-C > Oxygen/Nitrogen/WP/Jessie/PVS5/PVS6? I would like to use the PVS > backend of Why for deductive methods. > > It should work with: > - Nitrogen + Jessie + Why 2 + PVS 5 > - Nitrogen + Jessie + Why 2 (to have Jessie) + Why 3 + PVS 6 (not yet released) > - Oxygen + ??? > > Jessie is not yet usable with Oxygen. While no new version of Jessie has been released for Oxygen yet, the Oxygen branch works fine. (And it should serve as the next release with no modification other than version/documentation.) svn co https://www.lri.fr/svn/demons/why2/branches/Oxygen jessie-for-oxygen So, to complete your list, - Oxygen + Why2/Jessie (Oxygen branch) + Why 3 + PVS 6 (not yet released) Best regards, Guillaume
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- From: Pierre-Loic.Garoche at onera.fr (Pierre-Loïc Garoche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with ACSL annotations
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with ACSL annotations
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with ACSL annotations
- Index(es):