Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- From: hollas at informatik.htw-dresden.de (Boris Hollas)
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:55:14 +0200
- In-reply-to: <47C0712F-E281-48EB-991E-263D6EADC271@enseeiht.fr>
- References: <1341236500.2183.49.camel@iti27.informatik.htw-dresden.de> <47C0712F-E281-48EB-991E-263D6EADC271@enseeiht.fr>
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:37 +0200, Arnaud Dieumegard wrote: > typedef struct{ > double val[2][2]; > }t_struct; > > t_struct b; > > /*@ requires \valid(&b.val); Here, you only specify that val[0][0] is valid. See the ACSL doc on how to specify ranges. -- Best regards, Boris
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- From: arnaud.dieumegard at enseeiht.fr (Arnaud Dieumegard)
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Predicates fully supported in WP?
- From: hollas at informatik.htw-dresden.de (Boris Hollas)
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- From: arnaud.dieumegard at enseeiht.fr (Arnaud Dieumegard)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Predicates fully supported in WP?
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others
- Index(es):