Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] WP - Verifiable annotations with some types but not others

Hi, thanks for  the quick reply.

I added:
requires \forall unsigned char n,m; 0 <= n < 2 && 0 <= m < 2 ==> \valid(&b.val[n]+m);

but it does not changes anything on unsigned char or unsigned int.

Arnaud

On Jul 6, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Boris Hollas wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:37 +0200, Arnaud Dieumegard wrote:
>> typedef struct{
>> 	double val[2][2];
>> }t_struct;
>> 
>> t_struct b;
>> 
>> /*@ 	requires \valid(&b.val);
> 
> Here, you only specify that val[0][0] is valid. See the ACSL doc on how
> to specify ranges.
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Boris
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss

Cordialement,

Arnaud Dieumegard
PhD Student
IRIT-ENSEEIHT / ACADIE
2 rue Charles CAMICHEL BP 7122
31071 TOULOUSE cedex 07
arnaud.dieumegard at enseeiht.fr
Tel: 05.34.32.21.64