Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Annotation pre-processing
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Annotation pre-processing
- From: benoit.gerard at dga.defense.gouv.fr (benoit.gerard at dga.defense.gouv.fr)
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:27:40 +0200
First thanks to the community for the fast answering (and the new version). I may have missed something concerning pre-processing of annotations and the option -pp-annot but I would like to be able to write something of the form #define SIZE 32 //@ requires \valid(tab+(0..SIZE-1)); void f( int *tab ); When launching Frama-C it induces an error (unbounded variable SIZE in annotation). I assume this is linked to the fact that SIZE is a parameter of the predicate. Is this a bug or a known limitation of the -pp-annot option? Best Regards, Beno?t GERARD [ENVOYE PAR INTERNET] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20130426/63106102/attachment.html>
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Annotation pre-processing
- From: virgile.prevosto at m4x.org (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Annotation pre-processing
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] New Frama-C version: Fluorine
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Annotation pre-processing
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] [Value Analysis] Math functions
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Annotation pre-processing
- Index(es):