Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] How to write assign for void* type argument of a function

Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] How to write assign for void* type argument of a function
From: abiao.yang at gmail.com (David Yang)
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:38:46 +0000
In-reply-to: <CAOH62JgTO1G68WN_UGXDLi0dFag7geNHs_xHic7RgUYRY_RovQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA1cxujF0zdab4k+y5qYuY-q8rMfQKRADK11q+CWy966wG0Oqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOH62JgTO1G68WN_UGXDLi0dFag7geNHs_xHic7RgUYRY_RovQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 8 December 2013 16:01, Pascal Cuoq <pascal.cuoq at gmail.com> wrote:
> Use:
>
>  assigns *((int *)data);
>
> or anything that is appropriate to your case.

Dear Pascal Cuoq,

This really helps a lot.
Thank you very much.


-david

References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] How to write assign for void* type argument of a function
  - From: abiao.yang at gmail.com (David Yang)
- [Frama-c-discuss] How to write assign for void* type argument of a function
  - From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)

Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] How to write assign for void* type argument of a function
Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] difference between specifying side effects for value analysis in two different ways
Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] How to write assign for void* type argument of a function
Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] difference between specifying side effects for value analysis in two different ways
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread