Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] difference between specifying side effects for value analysis in two different ways

Dear Wolfram,

Thank you very much for your prompt reply.

Yes, you are right. p is indeed a local variable.

Thank you for reminding me of this.

Best wishes,
-david

On 8 December 2013 23:33, Wolfram Kahl <kahl at cas.mcmaster.ca> wrote:
> p is a local variable of f;
> if the implementation of f assigns p, this is not
> a side effect visible to the caller.
> (The actual parameter of f might not even be a variable,
>  as for example in  f(q + 1).
> )