Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Using the \sum function
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Using the \sum function
- From: virgile.prevosto at m4x.org (Virgile Prevosto)
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 11:05:44 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CABNEXcZKVi-J4xVruG65-kAfyuMxdhjT803Mmuvnq0KZpajkCw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CABNEXcZKVi-J4xVruG65-kAfyuMxdhjT803Mmuvnq0KZpajkCw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, 2013/11/5 Alessio Iotti <alle.iot at gmail.com>: > I attach a file containing a simple C program that (perhaps) computes the > average of an array of integers. > Frama-C can't prove the loop invariant and the ensures clause of the > contract, and in both there are uses of the built-in function \sum. > According to the paper "ACSL Version 1.7 - Implementation in > Fluorine-20130601", the functions \sum, \min, \max, \product and \numof are > experimental. As far as I know, neither WP nor Jessie do support these constructions: they are type-checked, but that's about all. Best regards, -- E tutto per oggi, a la prossima volta Virgile
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Using the \sum function
- From: alle.iot at gmail.com (Alessio Iotti)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Using the \sum function
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] how jessie and why platform work to generate a .v output?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Compatibility issue (frama-c-fluorine and why3-0.81)
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Using the \sum function
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Compatibility issue (frama-c-fluorine and why3-0.81)
- Index(es):