Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:20:22 +0100
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311071504310.4079@gamow.cs.utah.edu>
- References: <527C0595.5040000@cs.utah.edu> <CAOH62Jg5UyBhM6T3Fke9+gXaruBoQvRd5WB-m7=qGq-W0ue1Jw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311071504310.4079@gamow.cs.utah.edu>
I'm not sure I followed the discussion. Finally, is the default mode "strict" convenient or not? - Claude On 11/07/2013 11:05 PM, John Regehr wrote: > Pascal, I agree that your solution is the correct one, not only from the > point of view of making the solver's work easier, but also because some > unknown fraction of unsigned wraparounds in C code are buggy -- so we > should make no-overflow be the default behavior. Wraparound hides bugs. > > John > > _______________________________________________ > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- From: regehr at cs.utah.edu (John Regehr)
- [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- From: regehr at cs.utah.edu (John Regehr)
- [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] math vs. bits
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- Index(es):