Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Array problem - Jessie plugin
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Array problem - Jessie plugin
- From: luciana.burgareli at gmail.com (Luciana Burgareli)
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:55:49 -0200
- In-reply-to: <526A6E27.1020108@inria.fr>
- References: <CACfSD7YdmtPSckQvcFh=QUTcKnq5bs8TWevwFy2Z_GohJQvgsw@mail.gmail.com> <526A6E27.1020108@inria.fr>
Hi Claude, Thank you for your answer. It has worked. Best regards. Luciana 2013/10/25 Claude Marche <Claude.Marche at inria.fr> > > Hi, > > This is the same situation as your example with a struct. The workaround > is to introduce a ghost variable. > > There is no need to introduce ghost variables when you have two or more > array assignments because Jessie does a special treatment of parallel > assignments. However, the current discussion make me think that every > assignments should be treated as parallel assignments are treated. I may > consider adding this in the next release. > > - Claude > > On 10/21/2013 02:03 PM, Luciana Burgareli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a very simple example, but it was not proved. > > > > If we slightly modify the code and we add an assignment to the Ang2[1] > > (and the related assigns and ensures clauses), both the ensures clauses > > are proved. > > > > Why is not the attached example proved? > > > > How to solve this problem? > > > > We are using the Jessie Plugin, Why3 Verification Platform 0.81, > > Fluorine-20130601 and the provers Alt-Ergo 0.95.2, CVC3 2.4.1, Gappa > > 1.0.0 and Z3 4.3.2. > > > > > > Luciana > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > > Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20131031/cc1822b8/attachment.html>
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Array problem - Jessie plugin
- From: luciana.burgareli at gmail.com (Luciana Burgareli)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Array problem - Jessie plugin
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Array problem - Jessie plugin
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Problems with ensures
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] sums of arrays
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Array problem - Jessie plugin
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] how does Frama-C infer missing invariants?
- Index(es):