Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] How would one annotate a function in an external header?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] How would one annotate a function in an external header?
- From: sstewartgallus00 at mylangara.bc.ca (Steven Stewart-Gallus)
- Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 01:04:03 +0000 (GMT)
- In-reply-to: <mailman.49.1378461742.8435.frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
- References: <mailman.49.1378461742.8435.frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Wow, thank you for the fast replies! Thanks for looking for bugs in my specification. That's an interesting attempt to formalise concurrency. Are concurrency proofs that much more difficult because they require strong (an invariant must be maintained inside a function, and any "dysvariancy" must be confined to atomic primitives) as opposed to weak invariants (an invariant must be maintained at function enter, and exit,) or are concurrency proofs difficult for other reasons? Thank you for the help. I'll study it in more detail later. Frama-C is looking really powerful (in particular the value analysis looks like it'll be really useful for debugging,) although I'm still having a few problems with it (Frama-C isn't treating main as anything special, and is paranoid that the system might pass main bad pointers in argv.) This is isn't the thread to discuss this though, and I'll post later when I think out my problems more.
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Which version of Frama-C/Why to use PVS ? (Jessie or WP)
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Could I disable acsl/rte/wp annotation in value analysis? or treat all property to be valid in value analysis?
- Index(es):