Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- From: frank at dordowsky.de (Frank Dordowsky)
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:45:54 +0200 (CEST)
- In-reply-to: <534E274C.1000300@free.fr>
- References: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1404152138470.718@dordowsky.de> <534E274C.1000300@free.fr>
Hi Anne, thanks for the hint, it works exactly as you said: I can now prove all assertions with the exception of the initial one. Frank
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- From: frank at dordowsky.de (Frank Dordowsky)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- From: anne.pacalet at free.fr (Anne Pacalet)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Question about get varinfo from vid
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Internal state represented by ghost variable not provable
- Index(es):