Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] question about treatment of assigns clauses in WP (Neon)

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] question about treatment of assigns clauses in WP (Neon)
  • From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
  • Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:42:05 +0000
  • In-reply-to: <mailman.29.1398160925.28562.frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
  • References: <mailman.29.1398160925.28562.frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Hello Virgile, Pascal, and  Patrick,

thanks for your replies!

> the point is
> just to check that all occurrences of *p in assigns are guarded by a
> \valid(p) in requires.

That?s exactly what I mean!

> It'd just act as a consistency check for the
> specification itself, without any reference to an implementation which
> might not even exist in the first place.
> 

Jens