Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] verification of enum safety
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] verification of enum safety
- From: dmentre at linux-france.org (David MENTRE)
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:40:28 +0100
- In-reply-to: <B517F47C2F6D914AA8121201F9EBEE6701C7BB59DEA9@Mail1.FCMD.local>
- References: <B517F47C2F6D914AA8121201F9EBEE6701C7660449BC@Mail1.FCMD.local>, <52F9EE09.2060600@cea.fr> <B517F47C2F6D914AA8121201F9EBEE6701C7BB59DEA9@Mail1.FCMD.local>
Hello, Le 12/02/2014 20:31, Dharmalingam Ganesan a ?crit : > I wonder whether there is way for RTE and WP to automatically annotate and check such invalid usages. You can check it using a recent version of Clang compiler. """ $ clang -Wall enum.c enum.c:8:11: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'DAYS' to different enumeration type 'COLOR' [-Wenum-conversion] color = TUE; /* This is invalid - COLOR should be RED or BLUE*/ ~ ^~~ 1 warning generated. $ clang -v clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix """ Best regards, david PS: As far as I know, there is no such -Wenum-conversion option in gcc.
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: requires doubt
- From: dganesan at fc-md.umd.edu (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: requires doubt
- From: francois.bobot at cea.fr (François Bobot)
- [Frama-c-discuss] verification of enum safety
- From: dganesan at fc-md.umd.edu (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: requires doubt
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] State-based contracts in ACSL?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] CFP: VSTTE 2014
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] verification of enum safety
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] How to re-run command-line analyses?
- Index(es):