Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- From: matthieu.lemerre at cea.fr (Matthieu Lemerre)
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:43:50 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CAA1cxuh=XQ1Fie2OVv4D7FjHwzMwmtGPi7CXcqXHmH4Oyusfuw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAA1cxuh=XQ1Fie2OVv4D7FjHwzMwmtGPi7CXcqXHmH4Oyusfuw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, The best way to do that is to use ACSL assertions. For instance: ... /*@ assert x > 8; */ if(x > 8){ ... } This ACSL assertion will reduce the value of x, and that will make the test evaluate to true. In some cases it is possible that the reduction is not sufficient. In this case, I would advise using adding "assert(\false)" in the else branch: ... /*@ assert x > 8; */ if(x > 8){ ... } else { /*@ assert \false; */ } This latter assertion would prevent state to be propagated in the else branch. Matthieu Yibiao Yang <cs.yang.yibiao at gmail.com> writes: > Dear all, > > For a given if statement, we can get the evaluated condition value by using : > > (* the api is: Db.Value.condition_truth_value : Cil_types.stmt -> > bool * bool *) > let (flag1, flag2) = Db.Value.condition_truth_value stmt in > > For my source code, flag1 is false but i can make sure the condition > can be true, Could it possible to set the flag1 and flag2 to be true > then re-do the value analysis? > > How can I customize these values for value analysis programmatically? > Or could it possible to change the abstract interpretation and the > state of the statement (e.g. the if condition) programmatically? > > Thank you very much. > > -david > > _______________________________________________ > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- From: cs.yang.yibiao at gmail.com (Yibiao Yang)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- From: cs.yang.yibiao at gmail.com (Yibiao Yang)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Could I get the statement that caused the dead code programatically?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Could it possible to change the if statement state then re-do value analysis programmatically?
- Index(es):