Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- From: dganesan at fc-md.umd.edu (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:27:06 -0500
- In-reply-to: <8A90FE65-2C00-487C-9A30-5A629286B2E9@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- References: <mailman.29.1390647739.11169.frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr> <8A90FE65-2C00-487C-9A30-5A629286B2E9@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Hi, Yes, it does satisfy the contract. However, if there is a conditional statement which is always true then it is good to get feedback on that. It is a programming error most likely... Best regards, Dharma -----Original Message----- From: frama-c-discuss-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:frama-c-discuss-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Gerlach, Jens Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:31 AM To: Discussion Discussion Subject: Re: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan) Hello Dharma, I think your function satisfies its contract. So, what shall Frama-C do? Maybe, your issue is that the function also satisfies the following simpler contract? Jens int MAX_VALUE = 100; float x = 0.0; int status = 0; /*@ requires MAX_VALUE == 100; assigns status; ensures status == -1; */ int main() { if((x > MAX_VALUE) || (x <= MAX_VALUE)) { status = -1; } } _______________________________________________ Frama-c-discuss mailing list Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS920s96QmjhPtNwQsIfc6XCQXL8LccfEFCQXL8LccfKcCQXL8LccfEI6QXL9KnojujdE4txZdw2Dr5RkerlgXQ6PrJyWG7dGEtW3pIwZvmvjvW_ce3C3hOzRXBQQQQu73C3hOeLORQr8EGTssVkffGhBrwqrhdECXYyMCY-ehojd79KVI06vaAWsht00_QEhBLeNM12V2kc4RtxxYGjB1SKeNRniZyW4GmrFgSX7ltbSbEiFpKB2V2Hsbvg57OFeD4ng0fZa4prPIjr1EVhsdwLQzh0qmNueGWnIngBiPta6BQQg2YtlQK996y0e-vSDa14QgdMz-S9WgfYQgmGxV8Qg6ywe9X5njVg8WGq80BIfFI3hirKrr2ev
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code?
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C: Detecting unreachable code? (Dharmalingam Ganesan)
- Index(es):