Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- From: kazarmy at gmail.com (Khairul Azhar Kasmiran)
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:40:10 +0800
- In-reply-to: <54C7B0A3.6020805@inria.fr>
- References: <CA+Tazt7sOtQxyvgLwbFvWDQ=pniO2AQFh-xC216vEXd9aOprqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+Tazt76hoLNNnyXHo2TpXc7x41c8vT5+=0k4ughbbvoVpsCFQ@mail.gmail.com> <E49491B5-481A-45DC-97A7-A5D3C31476F0@cea.fr> <54C6244A.3050203@inria.fr> <CA+Tazt6Ps0+O=_ZBwxJ=Nkg5y+5DEiVCRX0id8VjBrfv1Z04Dg@mail.gmail.com> <54C7B0A3.6020805@inria.fr>
Ah, much clearer. Thanks! -- Khairul On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Claude Marche <Claude.Marche at inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 01/27/2015 01:14 PM, Khairul Azhar Kasmiran wrote: > >> Aha! So the problem was because the solvers did not receive any >> information on the lower bound of j. Hmm, okay. Still unclear to me as >> to why it's needed, since the invariant doesn't state that j == 1 is >> false after any iteration of the loop. >> > > Any loop iteration increments j by 1, no ? then if j >= 1 before the > iteration, then j >= 2 after. And consequently j == 1 is false. Qed. > > - Claude > > > -- > Claude March? | tel: +33 1 72 92 59 69 > INRIA Saclay - ?le-de-France | > Universit? Paris-sud, Bat. 650 | http://www.lri.fr/~marche/ > F-91405 ORSAY Cedex | > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20150128/d508cd04/attachment.html>
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- From: kazarmy at gmail.com (Khairul Azhar Kasmiran)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- From: kazarmy at gmail.com (Khairul Azhar Kasmiran)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- From: kazarmy at gmail.com (Khairul Azhar Kasmiran)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Invitation - Frama-C Day 2015
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] question about partition.c
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Invitation - Frama-C Day 2015
- Index(es):