Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] chained comparisons
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] chained comparisons
- From: cok at frontiernet.net (cok at frontiernet.net)
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 18:52:13 +0000 (UTC)
The ACSL1.9 document defines and discusses chained comparisons:Fig 2.2 gives a rule for pred as term ( rel-op term )+ But Fig 2.1 does not give a corresponding rule for terms.It just says that a term can be? term bin-op term Is it intended that chained comparisons may be used only in predicate position?Or is it implicitly allowed for terms also? since term bin-op term bin-op termparses as an appropriate tree? Thanks, - David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20150523/716e67a3/attachment.html>
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] chained comparisons
- From: boris at yakobowski.org (Boris Yakobowski)
- [Frama-c-discuss] chained comparisons
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] minor issue with Sodium source distribution file
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Assign clauses with ghost variables
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] minor issue with Sodium source distribution file
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] chained comparisons
- Index(es):