Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] What is the point of ``All models'' in Alt-Ergo?

Hi,
You should send your questions about Alt-Ergo to https://github.com/OCamlPro/alt-ergo/issues ; see also http://alt-ergo.ocamlpro.com/download.php
L.

> Le 27 janv. 2016 à 04:36, Wolfram Kahl <kahl at cas.mcmaster.ca> a écrit :
> 
> Since I cannot find Alt-Ergo documentation nor mailing list,
> I ask this question here, since I am using it only from Frama-C:
> What is the point of the ``All models'' option in Alt-Ergo?
> With that enabled (I am using it via the GUI as started from
> WP-goals in Frama-C), it has no trouble to decide
> 
>  //@ lemma falsum: 0 == 1;
> 
> as ``Valid (0.01s)''.
> 
> (Without that option, it only says ``I don't know (sat) (0.01s)'',
> which I still consider as a rather weak answer...)
> 
> The closest I found to documentation is the help flag:
> 
>  alt-ergo -h
> 
> produces
> 
>  -all-models experimental support for all models
>  -model experimental support for models on labeled terms
>  -complete-model experimental support for complete model
> 
> , but I don't quite know how I am supposed to understand these ---
> is validity of falsum a result of the experimental nature of these,
> or is it by design of ``all models''?
> 
> $ alt-ergo -version
> 0.99.1
> 
> 
> Wolfram
> _______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss