Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:50:12 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20090609174616.026a8278@is005115>
- References: <FC0686BB6178BC43B9DC035287A11A7208195A3C72@SI-MBX12.de.bosch.com> <20090609174616.026a8278@is005115>
Hello Virgile, >In fact, the default behavior of jessie is >indeed to consider that the arguments of a function points to distinct >memory locations. This usually greatly simplifies the proof obligations Of course, in most cases, this makes sense and prevents a lot of bugs. But I haven't found this in the ACSL documentation. Since distinct memory locations can be expressed with the separated predicate, I assumed that pointers don't have to be distinct by default. Best regards, Boris
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- From: Pascal.Cuoq at cea.fr (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] pset_disjoint
- Index(es):