Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Frama-c-discuss Digest, Vol 32, Issue 12

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-c-discuss Digest, Vol 32, Issue 12
  • From: dmentre at linux-france.org (David MENTRE)
  • Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:05:30 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <AANLkTinXecB6V8GXw=3tkfOuYoyojyDmx5f9d0O8S5LA@mail.gmail.com>
  • References: <mailman.69.1295694092.31928.frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr> <4D3D44C0.3000106@cea.fr> <AANLkTinXecB6V8GXw=3tkfOuYoyojyDmx5f9d0O8S5LA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,

2011/1/24 David MENTRE <dmentre at linux-france.org>:
> Yes. Please find attached a variation of Arnaud's program that
> compiles and runs under Jessie.
>
> I really don't understand why the assert in the for() loop of function
> f() (VC 6.) is not proved.
>
> I'm using Frama-C Boron with Alt-Ergo 0.91.

I still cannot prove the assertion with Frama-C Carbon beta 2, Why
2.28 and Alt-ergo 0.91[1]. The problem is probably in the assertion
itself, but I don't see where.

Regards,
d.

[1] And a slight modification on annotations, see attached C file.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dieumegard-case2.c
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20110124/d533c2a0/attachment.c>