Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Frama-c-discuss Digest, Vol 32, Issue 12

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-c-discuss Digest, Vol 32, Issue 12
  • From: arnaud.dieumegard at enseeiht.fr (Arnaud Dieumegard)
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:20:08 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=og2QO8+aKJ0kKWA9zkep_xdaiOirigos2omKt@mail.gmail.com>
  • References: <mailman.69.1295694092.31928.frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr> <4D3D44C0.3000106@cea.fr> <AANLkTinXecB6V8GXw=3tkfOuYoyojyDmx5f9d0O8S5LA@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=og2QO8+aKJ0kKWA9zkep_xdaiOirigos2omKt@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,

I tried to prove my program without the struct and it succeeded !!!

Maybe I have to create some logic specification for the struct ?
Or something to help the solver to understand what is on the structure.

You could find enclosed the new c-code.

I will now try to add some "structure specification".

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sum_list.c
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20110125/09ba5985/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------


Arnaud

On Jan 24, 2011, at 9:05 PM, David MENTRE wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> 2011/1/24 David MENTRE <dmentre at linux-france.org>:
>> Yes. Please find attached a variation of Arnaud's program that
>> compiles and runs under Jessie.
>> 
>> I really don't understand why the assert in the for() loop of function
>> f() (VC 6.) is not proved.
>> 
>> I'm using Frama-C Boron with Alt-Ergo 0.91.
> 
> I still cannot prove the assertion with Frama-C Carbon beta 2, Why
> 2.28 and Alt-ergo 0.91[1]. The problem is probably in the assertion
> itself, but I don't see where.
> 
> Regards,
> d.
> 
> [1] And a slight modification on annotations, see attached C file.
> <dieumegard-case2.c>_______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss



Cordialement,

Arnaud Dieumegard
Research engineer
IRIT / ACADIE
arnaud.dieumegard at enseeiht.fr