Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] WP: verifying a particular proof obligation
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] WP: verifying a particular proof obligation
- From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:58:19 +0000
Hello, The option -wp-prop allows to prove properties (annotations) with a particular name, say â-wp-prop=unchangedâ . However, I often have several post conditions, loop invariant and assertion with the name âunchangedâ and I am not always interested to verify all of them but only a specific generated proof obligations. My question is if there is an option to verify a particular proof obligation by supplying its âinternalâ names such as typed_external_push_heap_ensures_unchanged ? Regards Jens
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: verifying a particular proof obligation
- From: virgile.prevosto at m4x.org (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: verifying a particular proof obligation
- From: Patrick.Baudin at cea.fr (BAUDIN Patrick)
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: verifying a particular proof obligation
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] 2 new postdoc positions on Frama-C at CEA Paris Saclay
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] WP: verifying a particular proof obligation
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] 2 new postdoc positions on Frama-C at CEA Paris Saclay
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] WP: verifying a particular proof obligation
- Index(es):