Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Compiling Frama-C on Ubuntu 9.10

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Compiling Frama-C on Ubuntu 9.10
  • From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
  • Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:33:33 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <1271672778.2090.46.camel@iti27>
  • References: <1271664766.2090.3.camel@iti27> <20100419102741.3d1f3c42@is010235> <1271668015.2090.24.camel@iti27> <4BCC1FD7.40305@cea.fr> <1271671844.2090.28.camel@iti27> <1271672778.2090.46.camel@iti27>
> Frama-C contains a local ocamlgraph. It seems that the makefile for
> alt-ergo doesn't find this one. Should I install libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev
> as suggested?

This should work. Alt-ergo is less picky than Frama-C about the version of
ocamlgraph it links with.

> What to about the local ocamlgraph package? Should i
> uninstall frama-c and recompile with the global ocamlgraph package?

There is no need to. If you did, Frama-C would probably elect to use its
own ocamlgraph, since it is always using the last features that are likely
not to be found in a distribution's packaged version of ocamlgraph.

There is absolutely no ill effect when using different versions of
ocamlgraph in Frama-C and alt-ergo. They live in separate processes
and communicate only indirectly (via Why) and through text files.

Pascal